Freyja
Runes & Seidr -
12
-
first edition March
1999 Imbloc
LOKI


A misunderstood God or just
another archetype?
Probably the most misunderstood of
the Northern Gods, many have come to view Loki as a vile being but this is probably a misconception?
Loki today seems
to have a strong following of Neo-Pagan eclectics who have taken on
this deity from generic Asatru (calling themselves Lokeans) to
represent some aspect of Carl Jung's Archetypal gnosis or worse
still compare him to other mythological deities from other belief
systems without considering the primary sources.
See
Norrćn Trú (Old Norse Religion) for an example of how to approach
correctly research on Old Norse Religion and the gods:
http://tinyurl.com/p347z
Neo-pagans today
have the luxury of possessing some form of mass communications
device with electronic
instant information via cell phones, personal computers and the internet. They
also have access to major libraries that stores the knowledge from
multiple cultures. This insight and intellectual wisdom has allowed
moderns to see similarities in common traits between cultural
deities. What we tend to forget also that it is a
miscalculation to make assessments of past history using modern day
Judeo Christian politically correct values.
However scholars
and academics in Norse Mythology do not use Comparative Mythology, Jung's Archetypal
analogies or Unverified Personal Gnosis as a basis to discuss Old
Norse Religion. Comparative mythology generally works by conflating
material gathered from many questionable sources in an ad hoc manner, without
verifiable or conclusive evidence as to why one should assume that
two seemingly separate things should be seen as the same. There is a
major flaw in logical thinking here and such
comparative mythological approaches are usually generated by those posing under the guise
of pseudo-scholarship that refutes the burden of evidence but
prefers broad speculation on psychological theories or comparative
mythology mainly on Asatru 101 e-forums.
There are too many wild leaps
of faith using this very flawed methodology that strings together
many loose threads of unconnected ideas into a seemingly plausible
theory. The
gods/goddesses are not some sort of estranged beings if we bother to
take the time out to get to know them, and honour them. Simply
viewing the Gods as archetypes seems shallow and cold, yet to see
the Gods as individuals warrants more study than to revere a generic
force as an aspect of other beings. The Gods should be researched,
studied and met as individuals and not generic versions of other
gods from Egypt, India or Greece! Consider also the great deal of
discernment between deities over any given landscape. It requires a
great deal of faith to perceive a deity as separate from another. It
denies most of our intellectual minds, since it seems more logical
to subscribe to something such as Jung's psychological theories.
But then perhaps the term
*Intellectual Laziness
may apply here!
There are no
causal connection between symbol and associated meaning, even though
self-similar patterns may occur. A phenomenon that appears in one
myth may seem similar in fashion within another myth but these have
to be causally connected and thus not only necessarily are related
to one another but express the same meaning? Consider also that this
self-similar expression might be the result of similar or different
structuring principles.
Scholars such as Grimm, Frazer, and and Dumezil were noted to have
employed the comparative mythology technique so intensively that it
eventually became discredited. The core conceit underlying this
method -- that there was once a generic "Indo-European" mythology,
such that the myths of one IE people can be deduced from those of
another -- has probably been a greater impediment to a proper
understanding of our heathen heritage than all the Christian
missionaries who ever lived.
Snorri Sturlusson coined the term Logi meaning 'flame' with
Loki. However folk sayings arose where Loki was blamed for summer heat
where sparks from a bonfire, scalded food or started fires! 19th
Century etymologies were suggested for Loki being derived from logi.
Without using the - ki suffix for diminutive and familiar names such
as 'kraki,' produced Lokki from addressing 'Fire' (as Log-ki).
When Loki appears in
the Eddas, it is mostly in his role of Instigator of Conflicts:
because of some unfortunate circumstance he is forced to act not
according to his own volition but to that of others. Most often his
loyalties to the Aesir are in conflict with a promise given to the
giants.
See:
http://tinyurl.com/qbvvz
Richard Wagner adapted Nordic myth for his Ring cycle translating Loki
into German as Loge ('fire') and gives him fiery powers?
Loki has been seen
to have often brought
the Aesir into great difficulties, but then delivered them with his
cunning.
Stofnun Árna
Magnússonar á Íslandi

I have had a few
encounters with Loki during Spć workings during the early 90s but my
experiences then with this Northern god were one of downright mischief
making rather than the Ragnarok end of the worlds struggle the sagas
speak of. As everyone knows his actions will ultimately help destroy
the gods, but there is more to him than that. I feel that Loki is a
role player in the scheme of things and he is far from being chained
up as many wrongly believe that he is? In fact there are some folks
who claim that Loki is amongst them today.
Loki is a renegade and trickster without whom the
courts of Asgard would be very boring
indeed. Through many wrong choices Loki has become the mischief-maker,
the instigator of wrongs doings in many tales. He is also disruptive,
representing the necessary questioning of authority if things are to
be kept running in an optimal way.
Loki
with his fishing net as shown
from the
18th
century
Icelandic
manuscript called
SÁM
66 in the
care of the Árni Magnússon Institute in Iceland.
See:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S%C3%81M_66
Anna Birgitta Rooth was already
formulating wide-ranging ambitions in her dissertation. Such ambitions
were spelled out also in her second major work, Loki in
Scandinavian Mythology (1961). In this study of “the kaleidoscopic
trickster character” Loki, Rooth threw herself into debates with
celebrated scholars in folkloristic, comparative religion, philology
and other fields. She ends her long treatise connecting Loki to
locke, a Swedish dialect word for “spider” and to such trickster
figures as Anansi the Spider in African and African American
traditions. Although Rooth’s book on Loki has met with a great deal of
criticism, not least because of the bold leaps of faith that it
requires from the reader, there can be no doubt that her reasoning is
clear and logical.
Rooth, Anna Birgitta
1961: Loki in Scandinavian Mythology, C.W.K. Gleerups Förlag,
Lund
See also:
Celander, Hilding
1911: Lokes mytiska ursprung, Edv. Berlings Boktryckeri,
Uppsala
de Vries, Jan
1933: The Problem of Loki, Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia,
Helsinki
Dumézil, George
1959: Loki, Wissenschaftlige Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt
Eddan: De nordiska guda- och hjältesĺngerna, translated by
Erik Brate, 1990, Niloé, Uddevalla
Holtsmark, Anne
1964: Studier i Snorres mytologi, Universitetsforlaget, Oslo
Rooth, Anna Birgitta
1961: Loki in Scandinavian Mythology, C.W.K. Gleerups Förlag,
Lund
Sturluson, Snorri
1978: Snorres Edda translated by Björn Collinder, Forum,
Uddevalla Ström, Folke
1956: Loki- ein mythologisches Problem, Almquist & Wiksell,
Göteborg
1993: Nordisk Hedendom: Tro och sed i förkristen tid
Akademiförlaget, Göteborg
Turville-Petre, E.O.G
1964: Myth and Religion of the North, Weidenfeld and
Nicholson, London
Anderson, Philip N.
1981: "Form and Content in the Lokasenna: A Re-evaluation",
Edda: Nordisk Tidskrift för Litteraturforskning, Scandinavian
Journal of Literary Research, 4, Oslo
*Intellectual Laziness
The expression "intellectual laziness" is frequently used
to describe a tendency not to ask questions, and not to scratch too
much behind the apparent, applying a kind of mental routine
(availability heuristic) or just following the crowd (herding).
Back Page
Next Page
Quick Links:
[
Freyja Runes Seidr
]
[
About me ]
[
Asatru &
Heathenry ] [
Links ] [
Freyja Runes Seidr
] [
Sabine the
Wolwa ]
[
Little
Bones Women ] [
Pierced by the light
] [
Rorik's
Column ] [
Rune Lore ] [
Rune
Origins ]
[
Rune Poems
] [
Rune Scholars
] [
Rune FAQ
]
[ Guido
von List ]
[
Poetry ]
[
Viking Age
Costumes
]
[
View Comments ]
[
My Reviews ]
[
Modern Myths
] [
Controversies
] [
Book Hoard
]
[
Book
Reviews ] [
Norse Mythology ]
[
HE Davidson ] [
Lotte Motz ]
[
NA Runestones ]
[
Your
Articles
]
Freyja Runes and Seidr Links
[
Section1 ] [
Section2 ] [
Section3 ] [
Section4]
[
Section5] [
Section6] [
Section7] [
Section8]
[
Section9 ] [
Section10 ] [
Section11 ] [
Section12
] [
Section13] [
Section14]
[
Section15] [
Section16] [
Section17 ]
 |