NAVIGATION

 

 
Freyja Runes & Seidr 3 -   first edition March 1999 Imbloc

Ibn Fadlan

Ibn Fadlan was an Arab chronicler. In 921 C.E., the Caliph of Baghdad sent Ibn Fadlan with an embassy to the King of the Bulgars of the Middle Volga. Ibn Fadlan wrote an account of his journeys with the embassy, called a Risala. This Risala is of great value as a history, although it is clear in some places that inaccuracies and Ibn Fadlan's own prejudices have slanted the account to some extent. During the course of his journey, Ibn Fadlan met a people called the Rus, a group of Swedish origin, acting as traders in the Bulgar capital. The first allusion to the Rus comes toward the close of the description of the Bulgars. When the Rus or people of another race came with slaves for sale, the king of the Bulgars had a right to choose one slave in each ten for himself.

Ibn describes a funeral ceremony which he observed at close quarters and which is generally taken to be an accurate account.  He reports that when a wealthy Norseman died, his material wealth was divided into three.  A third of his wealth went to his family; another third went to provide a funeral drink.  Ibn called the drink nabidh and the final third to clothe the dead man himself.  The drink called nabidh was consumed during the course of the funeral celebrations that lasted for ten days, during which there was musical entertainment and much sexual activity.  Some moaners were even reputed to have died from excessive consumption of the nadidh.

It was the custom that the kinfolk of the deceased would ask of his young male and female slaves: “Who among you will die with him?”  The respondent was usually a girl, whose willingness to die for her master was final and irrevocable. This maiden of the dead was now placed in the hands of two other young women who watched over her and followed her everywhere.  During a build up of what was to be a sacrificial killing of the girl, it was recorded that she gave herself up to singing, drinking and promiscuous sexual activity.

The dead chieftain’s ship was then hauled out of the river and prepared while a couch greatly decorated in Byzantine tapestries was also placed on the ship.

An elderly woman whom they call the Angel of Death embalmed and laid out the dead man.  The corpse was dressed and food and weapons placed on and around it.  A dog was killed, together with two horses, two cows, a hen and a cockerel.  The slave girl was led into ten several tents or pavilions of the dead chieftain’s kinsmen and during that time, the master of each of the tents had sexual intercourse with her saying, “Tell your Lord I have done this out of love for him.”

  1. On the day of the funeral, a Friday the slave girl was brought to the ship and there was lifted into the air three, each time saying:

  2. Behold I see my father and my mother

  3. I see all my dead relatives seated. I see my master in Paradise, and Paradise is beautiful and green; men and young boys are with him.  He called to me, let me go to him.

Outside the final shipboard pavilion tent, six more men had ritual sexual intercourse with her while the rest of the assembled men stood by beating their shields possibly to hide the girl’s cries.  While two men held the slave girl’s feet and another two held her hands.  The Angel of Death placed a rope around the slave girls neck which was pulled on whilst a broad bladed dagger was repeated trusted into the slave girls ribs until she was dead.

A Rus Viking said through an interpreter to Ibn Fadlan, “That he thought the Arabs were fools because you take those you love and honour most and put them in the Earth where insects and worms devour them.  We burn them in the blinking of an eyelid, so that they enter Paradise at that very moment.”  Within an hour, Viking Ship, dead chieftain, slave girl and grave goods were totally consumed by the fire.  The Rus Vikings then built a small hill mound and set up a great post of birch-wood on which they wrote the name of the chieftain and the name of their King after which they went on their way.

One of the distinctive characteristics of the Norse during the Viking Age was that they held a religious view separate from that of the rest of Europe. While the rest of the continent had been Christian for centuries, the Scandinavians held to a more ancient system of beliefs. This world view was again a reflection of their severe homeland. The Gods were seen as grim and distant figures having their own set of priorities, who generally found human beings beneath their notice. Petitions for intervention by the Gods were considered chancy at best.

Even if you could get the Gods to notice, they were just as likely to hinder as help. The Norse had a grim fatalism about life. The powers of good and evil were seen as locked in a constant struggle, and although good would triumph in the final battle of Ragnarok, they would destroy themselves in the process. In the end the best a man could do was endure. To die with a snarl on his lips and sword in hand was to guaranty his entry into Valholl, there to endlessly feast and fight with other chosen heroes. There was belief in some kind of life after death, and for this reason the dead were buried with their possessions.

This is the reality that was Odinism, so far removed from the  “Pub Moot Odinist” beer drinking binges or New Age fanciful fluffy bunny Odinism pretension and even the Russian government are opening up to the fact that the Russian race today have Rus Viking origins.  I believe this account of the Arab emissary Ibn Fadlan is a true and valid piece of history of the funeral practices of Odinism in the “Old Ways” as far as the burial of Rus Viking Chieftains is concerned.

Bibliography: The Viking Saga,  (Brent 1975, pp143-146)

http://tinyurl.com/ordk5


Snorri Sturluson 1178–1241

Much of the written source material about the goddesses of the North has survived in fragments of skaldic poetry written around 1220 Christian Era by an Icelandic Christian scholar called Snorri Sturluson. Snorri was a historian, born at Hvammr, CE1178; died CE1241. Snorri, who was the son of Sturla Thortsson (d. 1182), was the most important Icelandic historian of the middle ages. In him were united the experienced statesman and the many-sided scholar. As a child he went to the school of Saemund the Wise at Oddi, of which, at that time, Saemund's grandson Ján Loptsson was the head. On his father's side Ján was related to the most distinguished families of Iceland, while by his mother Thora he was connected with the royal family of Norway. Under this skillful teacher Snorri was thoroughly trained in many branches of knowledge, but he learned especially the old northern belief in the gods, the saga concerning Odin, and Scandinavian history.

By a rich alliance Snorri obtained the money to take a leading part in politics, but his political course brought him many dangerous enemies, among whom King Haakon of Norway was the most powerful, and he was finally murdered at the king's instigation. Snorri's importance rests on his literary works of which "Heimskringla" (the world) is the most important, since it is the chief authority for the early history of Iceland and Scandinavia. However, it does not contain reliable statements until the history, which extends to 1177, reaches a late period, while the descriptions of the primitive era are largely vague narrations of sagas. The Sturlunga-Saga, which shows more of the local colouring of Iceland, was probably only partly the work of Snorri. On the other hand he is probably the author of the Younger Edda called "Snorra-Edda", which was intended as a textbook of the art of poetry. Its first part, "Gylfaginning" relates the mythology of the North in an interesting, pictorial manner, and is a compilation of the songs of the early scalds, the songs of the common people, sagas, and probably his own poetic ideas.

Another historian of that period was a Dane called Saxo Grammaticus.  But unlike Snorri, Saxo lacked the fervour and passion, which Snorri had for the Norse Gods and Goddesses, often euhemerise the characters in the legends, presenting them as human beings who through clever deception or the gullibility of the peasant folk around them, immortalised themselves as divinities.  Saxo also strongly disapproved of the roles of the goddesses, debasing them and portraying them as greedy nymphomaniacs who played a sub-servant to that of the male gods. However it must be remembered that although Snorri wrote his poems recording and preserving the old myths with enthusiasm, his actual works were written over 700 years ago and at the actual time of his recording the myths, Iceland had been a Christian country for 200 years.  In 1000 CE under political pressure from Christian Europe, and faced with the need for trade, the All thing accepted the religious doctrines of the Hvitikrist or White/Pale Christ and within a few short centuries the last remnants of Nordic Paganism, which once stretched through all of Northern Europe were thought dead sending to gods to slumber.

Religious tolerance or rather intolerance lasted in Iceland till about 1639 CE, some six centuries later after which working with runes became explicitly banned by the Official laws of Iceland.  Those caught worshipping the Old Religion thereafter ran the risk of being burnt alive at the stake as heretics.  And is it not surprising then that knowledge of much of the beliefs of the common people has been obliterated by both time and suppression.

We must therefore also bear in mind the possibility that Snorri may have perhaps unintentionally misled us with variants of the truth or incorrect information.  His works were the result of piecing together fragments of half remembered folklore, some of which may have had creative conjecture used in place of fact in order to fill in the missing gaps.  Such is the nature of legends, being based on certain fact at conception but evolving into a totally different ideology or myth at the end.

It must also be remembered that poets lived in Iceland and Scandinavia long before the coming of the Hvitakrist who composed some of the earliest of the skaldic poems.  Their poems tended to be short alliterative verses filled with mythological illusions whose true meanings have eluded the best scholars of our time not least because they frequently refer to works, which have not survived. This leaves us with best guess at what is being hinted at?

Another favourite and much quoted source for the habits and beliefs of the early Germanic peoples is Tacitus, whose Germania was written at the end of the first century around 98 CE.

Of the early tribes he writes:

Augury and divination by lot no people practiced more diligently.  The use of lots is simple.  A small branch is lopped off a fruit-bearing tree and cut into small pieces; these are distinguished by certain marks and thrown carelessly and at random over a white cloth.  In public questions the priest of the particular people, in private ones the father of the family, invokes the gods and with his eyes towards heaven takes up three pieces one at a time and finds them a meaning according to the marks previously impressed on them.  If the message forbids something, no further enquiry is made on the question that day; but if it allows something, the further confirmation is required by the use of lots.”

Medieval Sourcebook: Tacitus: Germania, trans. Thomas Gordon

http://tinyurl.com/o5het

Archaeological evidence for rune-sticks:

"Small sticks of pine seem to have been the preferred material for carving runes on, both at the Wharf and in the rest of Bergen. Only three sticks of birch and one of beech are specially mentioned in the Liestřl Archive. A survey of the inscriptions on artefacts other than wooden sticks can be found on page 40. Two of the artefacts - a wooden plate, B002 without identifiable runes, and a wooden post, B579 with the runes iiiri, are lost. The rest of the objects are kept at Bryggens Museum."

Ref: On the runic material from Bergen.

http://tinyurl.com/rzmh5

It should be noted here that H. Mattingly gives as his translation a nut bearing tree rather than a fruit-bearing tree?  The difference is wide as all nuts can be classed as fruits but not all fruits are nuts.  This opens up the possibility as to the type of trees as to the types of trees, which could have been used to make rune sticks?  It has been suggested by the more notable rune authors that the trees used for making rune lots were Oak for the Saxons, Ash for the Scandinavians and Beech for the Germanic peoples.

However, there is no archaeological evidence, which supports a belief, those wooden tabloid runes so commonly seen in used today ever existed!  This goes for the many instant divining “Ancient Oracles” readily available out there commercially produced as clay rune stones, crystal rune stones, ceramic rune stones or any other type of made up fanciful New Age rune stone combinations.  Another example of a money-spinning very pretty and quaint New Age product packaged as the “genuine article” but in reality, complete balderdash made up by authors or companies dedicated to the exploitation of the gullible and dishonouring a noble tradition.

Semetic Runes

The topic and even the existence of a runic-like writing originating from Semetic areas such as  Hungary is often ignored by runologists, even when they discuss the possible origin of the runes. When so few people are active in a field, it cannot but show large deficiencies. For example, when a set of shapes is found, nothing proves it represents runes, rovás, or gothic letters, etc. The recognition comes when some archaeological studies have been performed, the shapes are well recognized for belonging to a given alphabet, an interpretation is given, and some kind of coherent body of knowledge is formed about the topic.

The Székely-Hungarian Rovás Script
The scene of the inscription relic was the House of Envoys in Istanbul. Sultan Selim the 2-nd, detained the envoys of King Ulászló for seven years in Istanbul, and one member of the envoy, Tamás Székely, incised with Rovás writing, on the outer wall of the stable of the House of Envoys, the message about their fate. The House of Envoys burnt down in year 1865, at that occasion the inscription was destroyed too, but luckily already in year 1553, here walked János Dernschwam, and he copied, and salvaged the text from perishing.

The Inscription from Constantinople

Ezer ötczáz tizenöt esztendőben írták eszt. László király öt követét váratták itt. Bilaji Barlabás ketö esztendejik it valt. Nem tön császár. Keteli Székel Tamás írta inet Szelimb török császár itet bé száz lóval

The English translation is: They wrote this in year Thousand Five Hundred Fifteen. They delayed here five deputies of King László. Bilaji Barlabás was here for two years. Emperor Nem tön. Keteli Székel Tamás wrote, he was locked in by Selimb Turkish Emperor with Hundred horses The above figure is the first part of the inscription.

Ref: http://tinyurl.com/g4sre

Everything You Always Wanted to Know about Tocharian*

by Mark Dickens

Tocharian is an extinct Indo-European language which stands by itself as one of the eleven major groups in the IE 1 language family. It was not discovered until the turn of this century, as a result of archaeological expeditions to Chinese Turkestan.

Since the characters from the 1st to the 6th spell out futhark, this word is used to denote the runic script. However, some characters are cut slightly different on the stone than what is shown within the text above:

An identical form of the futhark character shown under #23 is also found in the Tonyukuk inscription.

Chinese Turkestan, today known as the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region in the People's Republic of China, was the goal of numerous archaeological expeditions in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. The area consists primarily of a vast arid expanse known as the Tarim Basin, bounded by mountains on three sides which separate it from the adjacent areas of Tibet, India, Afghanistan, and what is today Soviet Central Asia. The Taklamakan desert covers most of the basin, and settlements have sprung up around the oases that are scattered throughout the area. Over the centuries, a number of sophisticated urban civilizations have sprung up in the area. The inhabitants were originally animistic and shamanistic. Later on, Buddhism and Nestorian Christianity penetrated the area. Starting with the Arab invasions of Central Asia in the eighth century, the population gradually converted to Islam, which remains today as the dominant religion in the area. Although the vast majority of the indigenous inhabitants today are Turkic, there were significant numbers of Indo-European peoples in the area prior to the second millennium of our era

Ref: http://www.oxuscom.com/eyawtkat.htm#intro


Freyja riding on the back of a Siberian snow tiger 

Sabine Morrison, a modern day practising Wolva from Germany who has been practising runes in the “Old Ways” for the best part of 27 years suggested to me the following ideas as a possibility that will be the topic of more in depth explanations at later reviews.

  1. Elder Fuţark at is simplest level is actually a storyline script

  2. Rune Dance was a way to preserve or recall the rune traditions through the centuries

  3. Power rune songs (galdrors) were used in ancient times as a means of timing for measuring out ancient medicines or herbs for healing

  4. Rune Stones may have existed as a possibility from a point of necessity. Our Viking ancestors in Iceland may have used small pieces of magma to do make shift runes due to the scarceness of trees in Iceland.

In the last instance, she argued that it would make sense for the runic diviner to scratch on to the surface of the magma pieces and afterwards draw the runes to divine rather then cast them.  If you cast them, she argued they would smash.  Also being from the bowels of the Earth, they would have seen magma to possess some magical ambience in their very nature.

Back Page                                                                                                                          Next Page


Quick Links:

[ Freyja Runes Seidr ]

[ About me ] [ Asatru & Heathenry ] [ Links ] [ Freyja Runes Seidr ] [ Sabine the Wolwa ]

 [ Little Bones Women ] [ Pierced by the light ] [ Rorik's Column ] [ Rune Lore ] [ Rune Origins ]

 [ Rune Poems ] [ Rune Scholars ] [ Rune FAQ ] [ Guido von List ] [ Poetry ] [ Viking Age Costumes ]

 [ View Comments ] [ My Reviews ] [ Modern Myths ] [ Controversies ] [ Book Hoard ]

 [ Book Reviews ] [ Norse Mythology ] [ HE Davidson ] [ Lotte Motz ]

 [ NA Runestones ] [ Your Articles ]

   

Freyja Runes and Seidr Links

[ Section1 ] [ Section2 ] [ Section3 ] [ Section4] [ Section5] [ Section6] [ Section7] [ Section8]

[ Section9 ] [ Section10 ] [ Section11 ] [ Section12] [ Section13] [ Section14]

 [ Section15] [ Section16] [ Section17 ]

 

                                                        2005 Rig Svenson ©